Win/Win Solution
also Win-win · No-compromise solution
A resolution that fully satisfies every side of a conflict by exposing the mistaken assumption that made the sides look incompatible, rather than splitting the difference.
A win/win solution gives every side of a conflict a good outcome instead of producing a winner and a loser. It comes from Goldratt’s Theory of Constraints, where the Evaporating Cloud diagram is the tool for finding one: you state both sides of a conflict, connect them to the shared goals or values they both serve, and then locate the mistaken assumption hiding in one of the logical links. A genuine conflict should not follow validly from a single common purpose, so there must be an error somewhere; correcting it makes the conflict “evaporate.” The premise is that there are no inherent conflicts of interest in reality. Apparent conflicts come from false assumptions, not from the world.
This stands directly against the tradeoff or compromise mindset. Splitting the difference between two positions usually means leaving the real mistake in place and accepting a result that satisfies no one well, like averaging two clashing measurements of a building’s height into a number near neither.
CF’s specific contribution is insisting that conflicts be resolved decisively: find and fix the wrong assumption rather than weakening good ideas to placate objections. CF extends the method inward to internal conflicts. Model each competing idea as a reasonable person and act as a neutral arbiter seeking an outcome none of them can criticize, rather than picking a winner (which CF treats as a relic of justificationism). Because the meaning of an idea is independent of whose head it sits in, resolving disagreements with others uses the same procedure.
See also
Contrasts with
Referenced by
- № 001Accumulating Progress
- № 057Emotional Development Through Practice
- № 069Evaporating Cloud
- № 087Future Reality Tree
- № 091Gradual Transition Plan
- № 107Internal Conflict
- № 110Intuitive Objection
- № 127Mistaken Assumption
- № 131No Inherent Conflicts of Interest
- № 165Procrastination
- № 201Thinking Processes
- № 204Tradeoff